Introduction: Navigating the Standards Landscape for ERW Steel Pipe
The procurement of ERW steel pipe requires more than just specifying size and material grade; it demands a precise understanding of the governing technical standards. In the North American and international markets, ASTM A53 and ASTM A135 stand as two of the most critical specifications for Electric Resistance Welded (ERW) pipe. A proper decision between these two standards is essential for ensuring the pipe meets the mechanical, dimensional, and safety requirements of the intended application, whether it be general fluid conveyance, structural work, or gas distribution. This guide provides a detailed breakdown of these two specifications, focusing on their differences, applications, and implications for procurement.
Part I: Distinguishing the Core Standards: A53 vs. A135
While both standards apply to welded steel pipe, their scope and focus are distinct.
1.1 ASTM A53: The General Purpose Standard
ASTM A53 (Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless) is the widely accepted standard for general-purpose piping.
-
Scope: It covers pipe intended for mechanical and pressure applications. It is broad, covering both Seamless and Welded pipe (including ERW) and applies to black pipe (uncoated) and galvanized pipe (zinc-coated).
-
Grades: It includes three types: Type F (Furnace-Butt Welded), Type E (Electric-Resistance Welded - ERW), and Type S (Seamless). It specifies two main Grades: Grade A and Grade B.
-
Grade B: Commonly used for higher-strength applications, often requiring stricter chemical and mechanical properties than Grade A.
-
-
Flexibility: A53 is a flexible standard, making it a common choice for structural components, compressed air lines, and non-critical fluid lines.
For a technical review of the high-frequency welding process that defines the Type E (ERW) pipe in this standard, please refer to: 【Anchor: High-Frequency Welding Explained: Applications and Benefits of ERW Steel Pipe in Gas Pipelines】
1.2 ASTM A135: The Dedicated ERW Fluid Standard
ASTM A135 (Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe) is a narrower, more specialized standard.
-
Scope: It exclusively covers steel pipe manufactured by the electric-resistance welding process (ERW). It is intended for conveying gas, vapor, and liquids, particularly where flanging and bending are acceptable.
-
Grades: It specifies two grades: Grade A and Grade B, with Grade B generally having a higher minimum yield strength.
-
Focus: A135 imposes specific requirements related to welding quality and pipe integrity relevant to fluid transport, making it a key standard for utility services.
Part II: Technical Differences and Procurement Implications
The differences in mechanical testing, hydrostatic requirements, and weld treatment are critical for procurement specialists.
2.1 Critical Testing and Hydrostatic Requirements
Both standards specify testing, but the context differs:
| Requirement | ASTM A53 (Type E/ERW) | ASTM A135 | Procurement Implication |
| Mechanical Testing | Specifies tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation (Grade A/B). | Specifies tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation (Grade A/B). | Both ensure basic mechanical integrity. |
| Hydrostatic Test | Mandatory unless the purchaser specifies the Nondestructive Electric Test (NDE) as an alternative. | Mandatory hydrostatic test on every length of pipe. | A135 provides higher confidence in leak integrity, crucial for gas pipe. |
| Flattening Test | Required for pipe over NPS 2 and below 4 inches OD. | Required only on Grade A pipe. | A53 is generally more rigorous on ductility for structural bending. |
2.2 Weld Treatment Requirements
In ERW pipe, the weld flash is trimmed off. A key technical requirement is post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) to normalize the grain structure.
-
Heat Treatment: A135 often implicitly (or through purchaser specification) requires thermal treatment to eliminate the "un-normalized structure" in the weld zone, ensuring the weld area is structurally sound and ductile, similar to the parent metal. A53's requirements are similar for Type E pipe.
-
Impact of HFW: Since modern ERW uses High-Frequency Welding (HFW), the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) is typically very narrow. However, proper thermal treatment is still best practice for all critical pressure or fluid applications.
For a comparison of how ERW's localized weld heat affects the Heat Affected Zone compared to the much larger HAZ of LSAW and SSAW pipes, please consult: 【Anchor: The Fundamental Differences: Manufacturing Process and Performance of SSAW, ERW, and LSAW Pipes】
2.3 Practical Application Scenarios
-
Choose A135 when: The pipe's primary purpose is conveying liquids, steam, or gas. The mandatory hydrostatic test provides higher confidence in the pressure integrity of the ERW line pipe.
-
Choose A53 when: The pipe is for general structural or mechanical purposes where both seamless and welded options are acceptable, or when the pipe will be galvanized. A53 Grade B ERW pipe is common for general utility uses.
Part III: Related Standards and Procurement Considerations
3.1 Structural vs. Line Pipe
A primary confusion in ERW pipe procurement is between "Structural" standards (like ASTM A500) and "Line Pipe" standards.
-
ASTM A500: Specifically covers cold-formed welded structural tubing (typically rectangular/square), used for building frames and supports.
-
API 5L: While API 5L is primarily known for oil and gas oil and gas pipeline trunk lines (often LSAW), it also covers ERW pipe up to certain diameters and pressure grades (Grade B to X52). When specifying ERW for medium-pressure gas transmission, API 5L is often preferred over A53/A135 due to its stricter quality control requirements.
3.2 ERW and Coatings
Both A53 and A135 pipes are frequently specified with a protective coating:
-
Galvanized Pipe: A53 explicitly covers hot-dipped zinc-coated (galvanized) pipe for corrosive or exposed environments.
-
External Coatings: For buried pipelines, both A53 and A135 pipes are commonly coated with 3-Layer Polyethylene (3LPE) or Fusion Bonded Epoxy (FBE) to ensure long-term integrity.
3.3 ERW and API 5L (Gas Pipe Context)
For high-demand, medium-pressure gas pipe projects, engineers often prefer to move to API 5L even for smaller diameter ERW. API 5L introduces more rigorous NDT requirements and material traceability than A53/A135.
To understand why API 5L PSL2 is the mandatory choice for high-pressure lines (often LSAW) and how it differs from PSL1, please see: 【Anchor: API 5L Line Pipe Procurement Guide: Selecting Between PSL1 and PSL2】
Conclusion
For procuring ERW steel pipe, the choice between ASTM A53 and ASTM A135 must be driven by the intended application. A135 is the technical choice for critical fluid and gas conveyance due to its mandatory hydrostatic testing, while A53 offers flexibility for general mechanical and structural applications. By understanding the specific requirements of each standard, procurement specialists can ensure they source reliable, cost-effective ERW line pipe that meets the exact needs of their infrastructure project.
